boston condos and boston real estate


boston real estate blog    boston real estate blog
Boston real estate. Boston condos.




Starved credit wrecked housing, not vice versa

Pull up a chair and enjoy the latest comments from Lou Barnes.

My favorite part: where he criticizes “golden boy” Robert Shiller.

He also seems to really dislike the job being done by Mssrs. Bernanke and Paulson.

His cure for what ails us? Easy credit.

Wait, isn’t that what caused this mess?

Okay, easy credit … with new lending rules & regulations, I assume.

——————————————————

Commentary: Mortgage rates fall while public policy still frozen

Lou Barnes
Inman News

Mortgage rates have begun a decline from the irrational levels of the last month, now approaching 6 percent and says here likely to cross back into the fives.

Part of the decline is due to deteriorating economic news. The toughest was a surge in new claims for unemployment insurance, up to 373,000, consistent with recession and suggesting that next week’s payroll report will show February contraction. Orders for durable goods tanked 5.3 percent in January, as have February measures of consumer confidence. Inflation is worrisome, but a soon-to-blow commodity bubble will fix that.

A two-part story today, housing as scapegoat for the failures of others. The real causes of this credit crunch — still called “subprime” — and the recession it has spawned are the grotesque failure of structured-finance products on Wall Street, and failure of oversight by their regulators.

The strange story of mortgage-rate spike and reversal began with the January fable that mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued by Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie (the “GSEs”) had become too toxic for investors to hold. That notion made no sense here: These GSE/MBS are as good as Treasurys, no matter what the ultimate default rate of mortgages within (Ginnies are guaranteed by the Treasury, Fannie and Freddie clearly “too big to fail”). The GSE/MBS market is $4.5 trillion, the deepest and most liquid market for anything on the planet except U.S. Treasurys.

Yet, traders said throughout February: “too many MBS sellers.” The excess on the market was certainly not new loan production. Now we know who those sellers were: big banks and Wall Street dealers, capital impaired, dumping the only liquid assets they have to make room for trash flooding back onto their balance sheets. The backwash: the remains of deals they sold but agreed to support if “something went wrong.”

The February went-wrong: almost $1 trillion in “auction-rate” securities — actually good-quality muni-bonds, but held in short-term rollover structures (note: nothing whatever to do with housing or “subprime”). When rollover failed in renewed crunch, an avalanche of illiquid paper hit banks, triggering MBS sales and higher mortgage rates.

The financial press is having a wonderful time ginning-up a housing depression, this week shrieking about new-home-price data: “Decline in Home Prices Accelerates” (WSJ), emphasizing the Case-Shiller index, down 8.9 percent in ‘07.

Case-Shiller is designed to magnify home-price declines. Robert J. Shiller correctly called the stock market bubble (his book “Irrational Exuberance” appeared on the day of ‘00 collapse), and has spent the last several years misapplying financial-market principles to real estate, gleefully predicting a 30-40 percent national crash in home prices.

The design flaw: It captures only sales of homes, obviously heavy with distressed transactions. For the authentic story and great methodology, visit OFHEO.gov and its “all-transactions” House Price Index, which includes repeat appraisals in refinances, by definition free of distress. By that measure, national home prices in the fourth quarter rose by 0.8 percent. Prices fell in only 11 states, and in only five of those were declines in excess of 1 percent. See page 21 of the report for its critique of Case-Shiller.

At the micro level, some spots are in horrible trouble: Of OFHEO’s 291 metropolitan statistical areas, 15 had price declines last year in the 10-19 percent range (all in California and Florida). And the national market is decelerating: Of 39 states with positive appreciation in the fourth quarter, 32 had gains of less than 1 percent.

The key to this unpleasant situation: Housing is sinking because of credit starvation, not the other way around, housing wrecking credit markets. No matter what it takes, the supply of credit must be restored to housing and the rest of the economy.

The public policy response is still frozen, Democrats trying to help families who cannot afford their homes to stay in them, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson refusing assistance to the financial system: “I’m not interested in bailing out investors, lenders and speculators.”

Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.

Copyright 2008 Lou Barnes


Share and save:

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon

Read other posts about: inman news feed

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (average: 2.5 out of 5 stars)
Loading ... Loading ...

4 Responses to “Starved credit wrecked housing, not vice versa” »»

  1. Comment by Anon | 03/01/08 at 8:41 am

    Well duh, Mr. Barnes. For folks who have been paying attention, August 2007 was when everything changed. Money is fleeing the mortgage market because investors no longer believe that real estate prices always goes up. All the financial mumbo jumbo in the world can’t stop the fact the investors are now spooked by the mortgage market.

    We are watching in slow-motion the popping of a bubble. Less mortgage money means the sales volumes and prices will have to decrease over the coming years.

  2. Comment by Informed Reader | 03/01/08 at 10:51 am

    Mr. Barnes’ remarks re: OFHEO and Shiller indexes confirm that he is clueless, delusional or both. There’s no perfect way to measure housing, but Shiller’s index doesn’t have the selection bias that OFHEO does (OFHEO sampling is limited to prices of homes securing GSE mortgages), and OFHEO includes systematically (and sometimes GROSSLY) inflated appraisal values. If inclusion of appraisals improves an index, why does OFHEO produce a “purchase only” index? If Shiller’s index has the “design” flaw Barnes suggests, why did OFHEO adopt Shiller’s method in the first place? If collateral values remain in positive YoY% territory as the OFHEO index indicates, why are so many homeowners upside-down? When an ignoramus like this can dispense housing “advice” and credit market “analysis” as a syndicated columnist, and originate loans in his mortgage broker capacity, it’s little wonder so many homeowners find themsleves upside down.

  3. Comment by Hard rain | 03/01/08 at 11:09 am

    Informed Reader,

    Excellent …..

  4. Comment by anon | 03/01/08 at 11:59 am

    Mr. Barnes: huh? Prices began falling in 2005 and foreclosures began piling up shortly thereafter. The credit crunch began at the end of summer 2007. As a general rule, causes occur before effects.

    Thanks you for this article. I previously kept mixing up Lou Barnes and Lou Dobbs in my mind, but now I longer need to make an effort to distinguish them - I can now safely ignore both of them.

Leave a Reply »»

Comments may be moderated, edited or deleted; by leaving a comment, you are agreeing to the Terms of Service of this website.

Receive auto-emails of new comments without commenting.


Boston Real Estate/Boston Condos - Search MLS

Select property type:
Select area:
Select property size:
Price from:
Price to:
MLS #




Welcome

Are you considering the purchase or sale of a home in Boston?

Contact us today to discuss ways we can help make the experience easy and stress-free.






Real Estate Flyers


Home Security


Ford Realty Inc - Boston
Boston condos


Denver Real Estate

Household Moving Companies

Boston Real Estate


Recent comments